The Perl Conference
Steven E. Brenner
Thu, 24 Jul 1997 18:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 24 Jul 1997, Georg Fuellen wrote:
> (I've just returned from vacation... Looking at >300 emails
> in my inbox, I'm a bit grumpy, maybe ;-)
> > >
> > > I would be interested in ideas about what the "goal" of the talk
> > > should be. That is, what impression do we want to make on the "Perl
> > > world"?
> We should do whatever it takes to get some seed funding from the Perl
> Institute... ;-) Other than that, I see few benefits that WE may get from
> THEM, or am I wrong ?!
The problem is not funding but manpower and expertise. (Funding would
only be an issue if we wanted to hire a programmer, which I do not think
is realistic). Presenting this work to the Perl community has, I think,
two major benefits:
- We may convince people that this is an "interesting" project. In that
case, gurus will be more willing to help answer our dumb (and not-so-dumb)
questions about design and implementation. Further, if we need any
special alterations to Perl (including bug-fixes or special performance
improvements), we're more likely to get them if we're perceived as being a
large and significant community
- By presenting the work in a Perl forum, we hold it up to scruitny and
hopefully succceed in demonstrating that it is worthwhile -- and hence
improve the respect for it among biologists. This could entail more
vounteers to actively design and code the objects.
> Bioperl sometimes seems like a project that never gets done because
> it's being talked about too often
I don't think that it is the talking which is preventing it from
happening... But I agree, the pace has been sluggish, which I suppose is
laregely my fault for not being able to coordinate things better as I
change jobs and go around the world...