[Bioperl-l] Re: [Bioperl-guts-l] bioperl commit
Aaron J. Mackey
amackey at pcbi.upenn.edu
Wed Jul 14 10:37:30 EDT 2004
On Jul 13, 2004, at 12:42 PM, Chris Mungall wrote:
>>> + $gffio->features_attached_to_seqs_toggle(1)
>> Again, $gffio->attach_features(1) seems sufficient ...
> OK; although one might be led to expect that the argument for a method
> with that name would be a list of SeqFeatures. Is the BP method name
> syntax enshrined anywhere, or is it more a general set of principles
> shared by the authors?
You're right. No, there is no shrine, I think it's like the difference
between art and pornography; we know it when we see it. Perhaps
"$gffio->features_attached_to_seqs(1)" is the necessarily-long-but-best
> So perhaps I should reeingineer it a bit so that it rejects anything
> doesn't follow the spec. This makes it easier to use the FASTA parser.
I think that'd be great, and should simplify matters a bit.
More information about the Bioperl-l