[Bioperl-l] RE: SeqWithQuality and biosql

mark.schreiber at novartis.com mark.schreiber at novartis.com
Wed Jul 6 20:59:13 EDT 2005

Good point. I would prefer a system that only uses delimiters for 
ambiguous cases like the one you show but I guess thats pretty complex so 
maybe delimiters for every sub-alphabet.

- Mark

Hilmar Lapp <hlapp at gnf.org>
07/07/2005 12:30 AM

        To:     Mark Schreiber/GP/Novartis at PH
        cc:     "Richard HOLLAND" <hollandr at gis.a-star.edu.sg>, Bioperl 
<bioperl-l at bioperl.org>, biosql-l at open-bio.org
        Subject:        Re: [Bioperl-l] RE: SeqWithQuality and biosql

On Jul 5, 2005, at 10:37 PM, mark.schreiber at novartis.com wrote:

> Actually under my proposal
> (a(17)) would imply (DNAx(SubInteger[0..9]xSubInteger[0..9]))

That's why I didn't like it - how would you encode 
(DNAx(SubInteger[0..99]xSubInteger[0..99]) in this proposal? Require 
each component to be two-digit? There ought to be delimiters between 
the operands, no?

Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp at gnf.org
GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757

More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list