[Bioperl-l] RC3 candidates
hartzell at kestrel.alerce.com
Fri Sep 30 13:12:36 EDT 2005
Aaron J. Mackey writes:
> I would highly recommend that stuff in the bioperl-* namespace be co-
> numbered, so that we can simply say BioPerl 1.5.1 and know what we're
> talking about, regardless of the CVS packaging. BioSQL, an
> independent project, can have any numbering it desires.
Whatever version number you choose, it'd be really useful to assign a
tag in the repository that marks the release as part of the great
bioperl release of 1.5.1.
More information about the Bioperl-l