[Bioperl-l] RC3 candidates
jason.stajich at duke.edu
Fri Sep 30 13:16:28 EDT 2005
Oh we will for sure, not to worry. I just haven't been tagging the
RC because we are going through them pretty fast.
On Sep 30, 2005, at 1:12 PM, George Hartzell wrote:
> Aaron J. Mackey writes:
>> I would highly recommend that stuff in the bioperl-* namespace be co-
>> numbered, so that we can simply say BioPerl 1.5.1 and know what we're
>> talking about, regardless of the CVS packaging. BioSQL, an
>> independent project, can have any numbering it desires.
> Whatever version number you choose, it'd be really useful to assign a
> tag in the repository that marks the release as part of the great
> bioperl release of 1.5.1.
More information about the Bioperl-l