andreo_beck at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 3 14:14:34 EDT 2006
It still gives more than 1. Can you tell me how good approximation it does? I mean if its 1.3 can I assume it 1 or something like that?
Sendu Bala <bix at sendu.me.uk> wrote: Andreo Beck wrote:
> Can $hit_object->frac_aligned_hit or $hit_object->frac_aligned_query
> give outputs > 1 ? I get some > 1 values.
This should now be fixed in CVS. You should be able to grab just
Bio/Search/SearchUtils.pm if you don't want to install all of bioperl-live.
( http://code.open-bio.org/cgi/viewcvs.cgi/bioperl-live/ )
It should be noted that all frac_* statistics and probably others from
hit objects have had a high chance of being wrong in the past, and
frac_identical and frac_conserved can still be very wrong*. It would be
a good idea if someone were to make these methods return slightly more
[*] which is to say, more wrong than you might reasonably expect, given
the limitations with gapped or alignment-free blasts
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the Bioperl-l