[Bioperl-l] Bio::Species, Bio::Taxonomy::Node overhaul
hlapp at gmx.net
Mon Aug 7 08:52:38 EDT 2006
On Aug 7, 2006, at 4:38 AM, Sendu Bala wrote:
> So there will be a behaviour change - now get_lca really does only get
> the lowest common ancestor of input nodes, which necessarily can't be
> any of the input nodes themselves.
> I'd call the old behaviour a bug that has now been fixed. (Though the
> code had a comment to the effect that it was a quite deliberate choice
> on the part of the author.)
I inclined to call the new behavior a bug. Why would the lca between
node A and node B not be defined, or be an ancestor node of A instead
of A itself? Likewise, why would the lca between a node A and its
child node B not be A but instead an ancestor node of A?
Or am I missing something?
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at gmx dot net :
More information about the Bioperl-l