[Bioperl-l] XML parser preference?

Chris Fields cjfields at uiuc.edu
Wed Aug 9 18:25:30 EDT 2006


Mauricio,

Thanks for reminding me.  I completely forgot about that!  

I think I'll give XML::Twig a look (somewhat tree-based).  I may play around
with both stream and tree-based to see what would work the best; my guess is
tree-based from the XML returned, but SAX may be faster in the end.  Thanks
again!

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mauricio Herrera Cuadra [mailto:arareko at campus.iztacala.unam.mx]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 5:15 PM
> To: Chris Fields
> Cc: bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] XML parser preference?
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> As I've mentioned in a previous thread, it depends a lot on what your
> module/interface needs to parse from a certain document:
> 
> http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/bioperl-l/2006-July/022151.html
> 
> I'm more into tree-based parsing rather than stream-based, but again, it
> depends a lot on personal needs and preferences. If it's possible to
> adapt your modules to use any of the already present parsers, that would
> be great and will avoid adding more pre-requisites to BioPerl.
> 
> Regards,
> Mauricio.




More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list