[Bioperl-l] Bio::SeqFeature::Annotated and mandatory type checking

Scott Cain cain.cshl at gmail.com
Fri Dec 15 13:09:48 EST 2006


On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 11:49 -0600, Chris Fields wrote:
> 
> To tell the truth I don't know if this is where the mandatory checks  
> were added in; I'm not too familiar with SeqFeature::Annotation yet.
> 
> I agree with Scott (and Matthew) that SOFA checks should be  
> optional.  Matthew, can you write up a patch and maybe some tests?
> 
> chris
> 
That's not where they were added in, it just that they hadn't been fully
implemented before then, so they didn't work (which probably meant they
weren't mandatory, though I don't remember (it could be that it just
croaked)).

Scott

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott Cain, Ph. D.                                   cain.cshl at gmail.com
GMOD Coordinator (http://www.gmod.org/)                     216-392-3087
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/bioperl-l/attachments/20061215/b248a096/attachment.bin 


More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list