[Bioperl-l] RemoteBlast users - potentially major changes - please reply
rahall2 at ualr.edu
Mon Feb 6 21:46:44 EST 2006
To everyone who uses RemoteBlast.pm:
Would anyone object to RemoteBlast being rewritten in a way that requires
NCBI's blastcl3 executable?
Binary downloads of blastcl3 (column "netblast") are available for numerous
platforms at: http://ncbi.nih.gov/BLAST/download.shtml
Does anyone require or desire a "pure perl" implementation? If so, please
explain the advantage you see with such an implementation.
MidSouth Bioinformatics Center
University of Arkansas at Little Rock
More information about the Bioperl-l