[Bioperl-l] another searchIO bug? with blast report

Jason Stajich jason.stajich at duke.edu
Fri Feb 17 14:01:45 EST 2006


In case people on the list think that by my speaking up about  
question means they should ignore it...

Hopefully someone else can help debug this - I really don't have time  
I'm afraid.

-jason


On Feb 17, 2006, at 4:18 AM, Anders Stegmann wrote:

>
>
>>>> Anders Stegmann <anst at kvl.dk> 02/16/06 11:20 am >>>
> Hi!
>
> I am blasting a protein seq (query) against an identical seq with a
> deletion of Aa nr 61 (subject).
> Then I print out the type of nomatch Aa and its position.
> The nomatch for the query seq is Aa G at position 61, which is  
> correct.
> The nomatch for the subject seq is V at position 60, which is  
> definitely
> not correct!?
>
> Is this a bug?
>
> testblast2.pl is the program to run
>
> Q0045 is the query seq.
>
> Q0045del61 is the subject seq (it has to be formated: formatdb -i
> Q0045del61 -p T -o F).
>
> Regards Anders.
>
>
> <Q0045>
> <Q0045del61>
> <testblast2.pl>
> <testigen1.html>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l

--
Jason Stajich
Duke University
http://www.duke.edu/~jes12




More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list