cjfields at uiuc.edu
Thu Jun 1 12:20:34 EDT 2006
Sounds good to me. I guess the tutorial (post-stripping)would be moved to
/scripts or /examples then?
Also, what do we do about similar situation with other docs moved to the
wiki (INSTALL, INSTALL.WIN, etc)? Should we have a placeholder file in the
distribution pointing out the wiki docs instead?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mauricio Herrera Cuadra [mailto:arareko at campus.iztacala.unam.mx]
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 11:13 AM
> To: Brian Osborne
> Cc: Chris Fields; bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org; 'Jay Hannah'
> Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/Bptutorial.pl
> You're right Brian. I also think that the text/POD part is more
> important than the script. Since we're more into moving everything to
> the Wiki, I believe this would be the right approach.
> Moving the script part of the tutorial into the examples/ directory is
> also a nice idea.
> Brian Osborne wrote:
> > Mauricio,
> > Bernd didn't say he want the _script_ in the package, he said he wanted
> > bptutorial.pl in the package, not indicating whether it was the
> > documentation or the script that was important. It's my suspicion that
> > documentation is more important than the script, and this is what my
> > letter was asking, in part: is the script important? Or can we focus on
> > text/POD part?
> > Brian O.
> > On 5/31/06 6:49 PM, "Mauricio Herrera Cuadra"
> > <arareko at campus.iztacala.unam.mx> wrote:
> >> I agree with what Bernd Web said in another reply. For some people will
> >> be nice to still be able to run the script from the codebase and
> >> interact with it.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioperl-l mailing list
> > Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> MAURICIO HERRERA CUADRA
> arareko at campus.iztacala.unam.mx
> Laboratorio de Genética
> Unidad de Morfofisiología y Función
> Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, UNAM
More information about the Bioperl-l