[Bioperl-l] "progress": useful changes vs. "shiny new thingie"

Brian Osborne bosborne11 at verizon.net
Thu Nov 16 13:09:01 EST 2006


So a package like bioperl-ext, normally requiring a C compiler and
make/nmake, now no longer needs make/nmake? I don't recall this coming up in
our discussions...

Brian O.

On 11/16/06 11:55 AM, "Chris Fields" <cjfields at uiuc.edu> wrote:

> Anything using make/nmake will need to be changed in docs.

More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list