[Bioperl-l] Use of Root.pm versus RootI.pm
hlapp at gmx.net
Mon Oct 16 13:04:24 EDT 2006
So it looks like an abstract base class, not an interface that
defines a contract or API? Should use Root.pm then, would be my vote.
On Oct 16, 2006, at 4:08 AM, Sendu Bala wrote:
> Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>> What does the POD (and the code) say about instantiating it?
> =head1 SYNOPSIS
> # do not use this object directly, it provides the following
> # for its subclasses
> =head1 DESCRIPTION
> This is a basic module from which to build executable wrapper modules.
> It has some basic methods to help when implementing new modules.
> There is no new() method.
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at gmx dot net :
More information about the Bioperl-l