cjfields at uiuc.edu
Sun Oct 29 13:09:54 EST 2006
On Oct 29, 2006, at 11:06 AM, Eric Ross wrote:
> Thanks for all the help.
> I've been looking at the code for the PAML rst parser. It's a bit
> We have written a parser specific for our needs, but it looks to be
> a pretty complicated matter to make it generic.
> The output of PAML can vary a lot depending upon your options and
> this section can be repeated multiple times. I'm sure someone with
> a good grasp of the potential output of PAML could come up with
> something, but I'll admit to being at a loss.
I planned on looking at ways to integrate the protein-based PAML
programs but I'm working on a different area at the moment. I agree
it may be hard to adequately genericize parsing/methods to accomplish
this, but if you have any ideas feel free to post them. Again, I
would suggest adding any proposed enhancements or bugs to Bugzilla:
Suggestions or bug reports on the list sometimes get lost in the
shuffle, esp. since we're planning on a new developer release soon.
Lab of Dr. Robert Switzer
Dept of Biochemistry
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
More information about the Bioperl-l