[Bioperl-l] Anything more for 1.5.2?
N.Haigh at sheffield.ac.uk
Sat Sep 30 07:27:42 EDT 2006
Quoting Chris Fields <cjfields at uiuc.edu>:
> I'll generate the INSTALL doc this weekend, so don't worry about the
> addition of PPM3/PPM4 stuff until you can get around to it (the initial
> PPM3. The INSTALL.WIN doc can have a 'please refer to the web page' note at
> the top for the time being. There may be one more RC before the release
Ok - will do.
> The main issue on Windows installation was that we plan on recommending
> ActivePerl 5.8.819 or higher for PPM4 installation, correct?
Yep, that's correct.
> Christopher Fields
> Postdoctoral Researcher - Switzer Lab
> Dept. of Biochemistry
> University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bioperl-l-bounces at lists.open-bio.org [mailto:bioperl-l-
> > bounces at lists.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of Nathan S. Haigh
> > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 12:20 PM
> > To: Sendu Bala
> > Cc: bioperl-l
> > Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] Anything more for 1.5.2?
> > Sendu Bala wrote:
> > > RC1 for 1.5.2 is tentatively set for October 2nd. I have a few minor
> > > things to polish up, but I should be done by that date.
> > >
> > > Does anyone else have anything in mind that they are working on and
> > > would like to see in the 1.5.2 release but that might not be finished by
> > > the 2nd? Ideally I don't want to add anything to the 1.5.2 branch after
> > > RC1 that isn't a bug-fix of a clearly defined error-generating problem
> > > revealed by usage of RC1.
> > >
> > > Can anyone think of other things that ought to be done for the release
> > > that aren't mentioned on http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/Release_1.5.2 ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Sendu.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bioperl-l mailing list
> > > Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> > > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> > >
> > Does that mean you want me to update the wikified version of the
> > INSTALL.WIN file in order that Chris can generated the relevant text
> > file for inclusion in RC1? Or can this wait till just before the
> > official 1.5.2 release? It's just that away all next week so it's would
> > be a bit of a push to get it in before I go away.
> > Cheers
> > Nath
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioperl-l mailing list
> > Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
More information about the Bioperl-l