[Bioperl-l] Bio::DB::Biblio::PDF - incomplete?

Chris Fields cjfields at uiuc.edu
Mon Apr 30 13:55:01 EDT 2007


Agreed; even some seq. records may have DOI now.  PubMed and PMC XML  
contain this, so it is possible to parse the DOI out if one were  
inclined to incorporate this into Bio::Biblio (I added a doi() getter/ 
setter into Bio::Annotation::Reference a few months back).

chris

On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Allen Day wrote:

> DOI is definitely the right way to do this.  It wasn't implemented
> widely at the time I wrote this module.
>
> -Allen
>
> On 4/30/07, Stéphane Téletchéa <steletch at jouy.inra.fr> wrote:
>> Allen Day a écrit :
>>> Doesn't matter to me if it stays or not.  If you're cleaning house
>>> feel free to get rid of it.
>>>
>>> -Allen
>>>
>>
>> I've worked on something on the other way around: get information  
>> about
>> a pdf from the DOI if present. Most recent publications do have a  
>> doi,
>> and i use this as a target for my request.
>>
>> This does not solve the problem, but may help others, feel free to  
>> ask
>> if it can help the ongoing work, the code is quite dirty ...
>>
>> Stéphane
>>
>>
>> --
>> Stéphane Téletchéa, PhD.                  http://www.steletch.org
>> Unité Mathématique Informatique et Génome http:// 
>> migale.jouy.inra.fr/mig
>> INRA, Domaine de Vilvert                  Tél : (33) 134 652 891
>> 78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France         Fax : (33) 134 652 901
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l

Christopher Fields
Postdoctoral Researcher
Lab of Dr. Robert Switzer
Dept of Biochemistry
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign






More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list