[Bioperl-l] Clarifying license of bioperl
hlapp at gmx.net
Sat Aug 18 12:13:28 EDT 2007
On Aug 18, 2007, at 7:33 AM, Alex Lancaster wrote:
> I imagine the intent of the bioperl
> contributors is that it should be under the same terms as Perl,
> whatever that happens to be (which just happens to be GPL or Artistic,
> which is fine).
I fully agree.
> A clarification to that effect would be useful.
Agreed, too. Would you mind changing that language on the wiki, since
you seem to have a fairly good grasp on the issue?
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at gmx dot net :
More information about the Bioperl-l