dmessina at wustl.edu
Wed Feb 14 15:46:31 EST 2007
On Feb 14, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Chris Fields wrote:
> We should probably add something specifically for BLAST, yes.
> Other text parsers should be fine.
Good point -- I'll make it clear it's only pertinent to BLAST.
> I think we'll need to retain the capability for text-based BLAST
Agreed. Through the 1.6 release at least, I would think.
> particularly if NCBI continues to change the output.
Well, clearly the solution is not to use the NCBI flavor of BLAST. :)
(look at my email address)
More information about the Bioperl-l