[Bioperl-l] Auto-method caller proposal

Sendu Bala bix at sendu.me.uk
Thu Jan 4 11:21:18 EST 2007


Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> I see your point; and for the sake of reducing ambiguity/increasing 
> clarity demanding unambiguous parameter names rather than disambiguating 
> by the presence or absence of a leading dash is preferable I guess.
> 
> Just should be clearly documented for module wrapper implementers; also, 
> are we going to retrofit existing wrappers?

I think a retrofit would be a good idea. I'm considering doing it myself 
at some point if there are no objections. But some time should pass 
between me committing the method and the retrofit to allow time for 
'issues' to be discovered and resolved.


More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list