[Bioperl-l] bioperl-microarray: status?
cjfields at uiuc.edu
Fri Jan 26 09:05:01 EST 2007
Don't know if it's worth it, but could the microarray package be
modified so that it deals with data generated from or interacts
directly with Bioconductor (i.e. maybe including some specialized
bioperl-run set of classes to run Bioconductor tasks, return
lightweight bioperl microarray classes)? Allen pointed out in a
previous post that Bioconductor is the best pick for certain tasks,
while Perl excels at others:
Might be nice if we could merge both strengths together in some way.
On Jan 26, 2007, at 7:26 AM, Jay Hannah wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2007, at 2:30 AM, Allen Day wrote:
>> Eh, there is some discussion activity on the list, but not much. You
>> are really better off moving to Bioconductor.
> Ok, thanks. I added that to the wiki page:
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
Lab of Dr. Robert Switzer
Dept of Biochemistry
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
More information about the Bioperl-l