[Bioperl-l] SVN and ...Re: Perltidy
cjfields at uiuc.edu
Mon Jun 18 09:31:35 EDT 2007
On Jun 18, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Chris Fields wrote:
>> Did we make a decision as to the fate of cvs if we get svn up-and-
>> running? Keep it around (assuming svn commits would be carried
>> over to cvs and vice versa)? Or see what happens over time?
> Let's not plan for having cvs and svn writable repositories in
> parallel - that would create an administrative nightmare. Once the
> tests complete, there'll be a clean cut-over.
My thoughts as well. Much simpler.
> What Jason suggested is to try and continue a read-only (anonymous)
> cvs repository, updated from the svn repository that the developers
> use, aside from an anonymous svn repository mirroring the writable
> one. This would primarily be for maintaining working URLs for those
> folks who http-linked into the anonymous cvs repository. What I
> added earlier is that even if that fails to be feasible, you can
> achieve the goal using some small CGI script and apache redirect to
> map CVS-style links to the anonymous svn repository.
I like the idea of a read-only cvs or a 'faux' cvs, though the former
would initially be easier as we already have it available. We could
just lock it down at some switchover point to read-only (something I
think Jason also suggested).
More information about the Bioperl-l