[Bioperl-l] SVN and ...Re: Perltidy
cjfields at uiuc.edu
Mon Jun 18 09:58:34 EDT 2007
On Jun 18, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Sendu Bala wrote:
> Chris Fields wrote:
>> On Jun 15, 2007, at 5:07 AM, Sendu Bala wrote:
>>> If its going to be difficult and a hassle, for such an unnecessary
>>> thing I'm not sure its worth it. There are more pressing things
>>> to be
>>> done for Bioperl.
>>> If I can just run perltidy on the entire package and commit, I'd do
>>> it. If that's not appropriate, I won't.
>> The choices aren't necessarily all or nothing. What about voluntary,
>> recommended use of a perltidy config file included with the
>> distribution, with additional 'caveats'?
> I'm happy with that idea. Why not come up with something and make it
> available for us to try out?
Will do. Maybe something that conforms to PBP; there's a PBP
perltidy config on perlmonks, along with some emacs/vim related bits:
More information about the Bioperl-l