[Bioperl-l] First cut svn repository [was Re: SVN and ...Re: Perltidy]
rvos at interchange.ubc.ca
Wed Jun 27 10:23:25 EDT 2007
> Are we going to try to push svn commits to the read-mostly CVS repo,
> or just keep it around for history's sake (I lean towards the latter).
I'm a little confused - surely once the svn is up and running we'll want *no more* cvs commits? Parallel repositories that each accumulate stuff will be a nightmare. I'm probably just not getting your point.
More information about the Bioperl-l