[Bioperl-l] Test overhaul complete
Nathan S. Haigh
n.haigh at sheffield.ac.uk
Wed Jun 27 15:16:40 EDT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Chris Fields wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Nathan S. Haigh wrote:
>> Sendu Bala wrote:
>>> Bio::SeqIO::entrezgene is still generating 'Pseudo-hashes are
>>> deprecated' warnings.
>> Ah, that reminds me!
>> I recently tried to do an install of the cvs head (a week or two ago) on
>> a clean installation of Debian 4.0 (etch). During the installation, of
>> dependencies, Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene threw an error as it depends on
>> Bioperl. I seem to remember this circular dependency cropping up before
>> - am I correct - and can you remind me how this was "fixed"?
> Wonder if Mingyi Liu would allow Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene to become part of
> Bioperl (and he could be come a dev). That would solve it.
Just to put the feelers out to see what people think.
It seems (to me at least) that Bioperl modules could/should? be released
as individual modules and that "bioperl" would really constitute a
"bundle" of all these modules - in terms of CPAN anyway. Am I correct in
this thinking? The Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene could simply require a
particular module rather than the whole of bioperl - might get out of
the circular dependency theoretically!?
I'm not suggesting moving in this direction, but just wondered what
others thought about this concept?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Bioperl-l