[Bioperl-l] First cut svn repository [was Re: SVN and ...Re: Perltidy]
cjfields at uiuc.edu
Wed Jun 27 16:01:40 EDT 2007
On Jun 27, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Chris Fields wrote:
>> Most projects make a clean break with cvs (no more commits) for the
>> reasons you point out. Not sure how the other core devs feel about
>> that but I could go for that; it would def. prevent headaches.
> There shouldn't be any cvs write support after the cut-over I
> think. I don't see the benefit that would justify the huge headache
Agreed, so maybe we should set that in stone. That means no svn->cvs
syncing post-migration as well, I assume.
Now how about a quick straw poll, what kind of access? svn+ssh is
already available, but some (Aaron among them) have indicated they
would like https as well (not sure how involved it would be to set up).
More information about the Bioperl-l