[Bioperl-l] Two Bio::DB::Flat swiss adaptors

Chris Fields cjfields at uiuc.edu
Wed Mar 21 12:19:20 EDT 2007


That's what I am thinking as well.  I may try removing the one with  
the version error to see what happens with tests...

chris

On Mar 21, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:

> Maybe someone wanted to change the name and failed to remove the  
> original?
>
> On Mar 21, 2007, at 12:34 AM, Chris Fields wrote:
>
>> Just curious, but why are there two Bio::DB::Flat::BDB swissprot
>> adaptors (Bio::DB::Flat::BDB::swiss, Bio::DB::Flat::BDB::swissprot)?
>> The only significant difference between the two is the following line
>> in seq_to_ids():
>>
>> Bio::DB::Flat::BDB::swiss : $ids{VERSION}  = "$accession.$version"
>> if defined $accession && defined $version;
>> Bio::DB::Flat::BDB::swiss : $ids{VERSION}  = "$accession.version"
>> if defined $accession && defined $version;
>>
>> The second is missing '$' in version, which I'm guessing is a bug?
>>
>> chris
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
> -- 
> ===========================================================
> : Hilmar Lapp  -:-  Durham, NC  -:-  hlapp at gmx dot net :
> ===========================================================
>
>
>
>
>

Christopher Fields
Postdoctoral Researcher
Lab of Dr. Robert Switzer
Dept of Biochemistry
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign





More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list