[Bioperl-l] Help with Bio::SeqIO

Chris Fields cjfields at uiuc.edu
Mon Nov 5 12:16:10 EST 2007


Yes, we would sort based on the splittype() and default to a  
particular behavior ('join') if one isn't designated, maybe with a  
warning indicating the splittype() isn't defined.  Using an 'order'  
or other defined types could also delineate a default sort/nosort  
behavior (probably the previous as it would replicate prior behavior).

chris

On Nov 5, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:

> I agree that there should be a meaningful default that results in
> "doing the right thing" in most cases if the user doesn't intervene.
> I'm not sure I understand all the details, but it sounds sorting or
> not sorting should depend on the split location type unless the user
> overrides it by argument. That's what you're suggesting, right?
>
> 	-hilmar



More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list