[Bioperl-l] Help with Bio::SeqIO
hlapp at duke.edu
Mon Nov 5 16:04:11 EST 2007
On Nov 5, 2007, at 12:41 PM, Chris Fields wrote:
> If we go through with the changes to spliced_seq(), should it be
> implemented for inclusion in v1.6 or wait until v1.7?
I would say they should be implemented ASAP because they 1) should
not change behavior for those for which the current default behavior
was already broken (and who therefore pass in --no_sort), and 2) fix
the behavior for those who erroneously assumed that the code was
going to do the right thing by default.
I.e., it sounds mostly like a bugfix to me. Am I overlooking something?
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at duke dot edu :
More information about the Bioperl-l