[Bioperl-l] Help with Bio::SeqIO

Hilmar Lapp hlapp at duke.edu
Mon Nov 5 16:04:11 EST 2007


On Nov 5, 2007, at 12:41 PM, Chris Fields wrote:

> If we go through with the changes to spliced_seq(), should it be  
> implemented for inclusion in v1.6 or wait until v1.7?

I would say they should be implemented ASAP because they 1) should  
not change behavior for those for which the current default behavior  
was already broken (and who therefore pass in --no_sort), and 2) fix  
the behavior for those who erroneously assumed that the code was  
going to do the right thing by default.

I.e., it sounds mostly like a bugfix to me. Am I overlooking something?

	-hilmar
-- 
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp  -:-  Durham, NC  -:- hlapp at duke dot edu :
===========================================================





More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list