[Bioperl-l] Priorities for a bioperl-1.6 release

aaron.j.mackey at gsk.com aaron.j.mackey at gsk.com
Fri Feb 15 13:06:58 EST 2008

> Or is the split intended to be 'core' == "anything and everything that 
> was in 1.4", '????' == "everything else"? In which case, what's a good 
> name for "modules created after 1.4"? 'crust'? ;)

Nah, "icing".

a module "use" map might be very useful to help identify "core" vs. other 
layers of mantle/crust/icing.


Some more serious alternatives to "bioperl-dev" and "-tools" might be: 
"-accessory" or "-optional" or "-other" or "-addons", etc.


More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list