[Bioperl-l] Priorities for a bioperl-1.6 release

Chris Fields cjfields at uiuc.edu
Fri Feb 15 16:49:33 EST 2008


On Feb 15, 2008, at 12:06 PM, aaron.j.mackey at gsk.com wrote:

>> Or is the split intended to be 'core' == "anything and everything  
>> that
>> was in 1.4", '????' == "everything else"? In which case, what's a  
>> good
>> name for "modules created after 1.4"? 'crust'? ;)
>
> Nah, "icing".
>
> a module "use" map might be very useful to help identify "core" vs.  
> other
> layers of mantle/crust/icing.
>
>  http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=87329
>  http://search.cpan.org/src/NEILB/pmusage-1.2/
>
> Some more serious alternatives to "bioperl-dev" and "-tools" might be:
> "-accessory" or "-optional" or "-other" or "-addons", etc.
>
> -Aaron

'bioperl-extras' (Ricky Gervais fan myself)

chris


More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list