[Bioperl-l] Installing bioperl with Strawberry

Kevin Brown Kevin.M.Brown at asu.edu
Mon Jun 16 12:47:43 EDT 2008


No experiences with SP, but if it supports PPM, then I would use those
rather than cpan for getting BioPerl installed on your system.

http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/Installing_Bioperl_on_Windows 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bioperl-l-bounces at lists.open-bio.org 
> [mailto:bioperl-l-bounces at lists.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of Amir Karger
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 9:19 AM
> To: bioperl-l at portal.open-bio.org
> Subject: [Bioperl-l] Installing bioperl with Strawberry
> 
> I got a new Windows box and was going to install Bioperl.
> 
> Questions: has anyone had experience, positive or negative, with using
> Strawberry Perl + Bioperl? I was thinking of going the 
> Strawberry route
> because they claim it acts more like UNIX Perl, which would 
> be nice. But
> if SP doesn't work with Bioperl, or is just generally 
> horrible, I don't
> want to install it.
> 
> SP claims it supports PPM, but I don't know whether I should 
> use that or
> the CPAN bioperl install.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> -Amir Karger
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> 



More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list