[Bioperl-l] Withdraw Bio::Graphics and Bio::DB::SeqFeature from bioperl distribution?
lincoln.stein at gmail.com
Tue Nov 11 10:24:30 EST 2008
Actually, it was while I was fixing these (and other) file overlap problems
that I became concerned about the difficulty in updating bioperl.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Charles Plessy <
charles-listes+bioperl at plessy.org <charles-listes%2Bbioperl at plessy.org>>wrote:
> Le Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:25:24PM -0500, Lincoln Stein a écrit :
> > Hi All,
> > The glacial pace of official bioperl releases is interfering with my
> > to package GBrowse 2.00 into debian and rpm packages. Is there any
> > if I withdraw Bio::Graphics and Bio::DB::SeqFeature from the bioperl
> > distribution and turn them into independent CPAN modules?
> Dear all,
> Just a word to say that when BioPerl 1.6 is released, the package in Debian
> unstable/testing can be quickly updated, and a backport can be made for the
> stable distribution.
> However, it would make my task easier if the following file conflict would
> resloved. GBrowse and BioPerl are shiping copies of the same modules:
> This is an obstacle to proper packaging, as on Debian system two packages
> not supposed to deliver the same file.
> Have a nice day,
> Charles Plessy
> Debian Med packaging team
> Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
Lincoln D. Stein
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
101 College St., Suite 800
Toronto, ON, Canada M5G0A3
Assistant: Stacey Quinn <Stacey.Quinn at oicr.on.ca>
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 Bungtown Road
Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724 USA
Assistant: Sandra Michelsen <michelse at cshl.edu>
More information about the Bioperl-l