[Bioperl-l] LocatableSeq NSE format - suggested changes
David.Messina at sbc.su.se
Wed Dec 16 04:58:16 EST 2009
I'd tend to be inclined more towards option 1 over option 2 because option 2 pollutes the name field. (Although that's not a huge problem if the '(strand)' is always just before the '/'.)
It's a question of whether to optimize human-readability over machine-readabilitiy: option 2 favors the former over the latter, and option 1 the reverse.
Whichever way you go, I think
> a new method that creates this, and deprecate[s] out simple non-stranded NSE
would be great.
More information about the Bioperl-l