[Bioperl-l] test fail
cjfields at illinois.edu
Mon Dec 21 16:12:45 EST 2009
T'was a bad test call. I basically changed the test to pull each feature directly by the primary tag, check it against the original sf prior to revcom, then check that the location was revcomp'ed correctly.
On Dec 21, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Chris Fields wrote:
> Saw that from the other day (LocatableSeq commit). I'll check it out.
> On Dec 21, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Mark A. Jensen wrote:
>> fyi, getting following failure (Perl 5.10, GNU/Linux x86_64)
>> t/SeqTools/SeqUtils..........................NOK 46/51# Failed test at t/SeqTools/SeqUtils.t line 275.
>> # got: '1..4'
>> # expected: 'complement(5..8)'
>> t/SeqTools/SeqUtils..........................NOK 47/51# Failed test at t/SeqTools/SeqUtils.t line 276.
>> # got: 'complement(5..8)'
>> # expected: '1..4'
>> # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 51.
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
More information about the Bioperl-l