[Bioperl-l] Unwise elimination of nodes inB:T:Node::remove_Descendent?
cjfields at illinois.edu
Fri Feb 6 16:11:18 EST 2009
On Feb 6, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Mark A. Jensen wrote:
>> I suppose the best way to deal with some of these questions (and
>> ensure Node/Tree is acting as expected) is to come up with several
>> vetted test cases indicating what we expect the proper behavior to
>> be for remove_Descendant(), contract_linear_paths(), and any
>> other problematic Node/Tree/TreeFunctionI methods. In fact, I
>> highly recommend any code changes like this add tests to the test
>> suite demonstrating the issue.
> I can work the example of the thread into a test, adding some
> of the points brought in by Hilmar-
Any other areas of worry?
>> Possibly related to all this is a fairly significant lingering bug
>> dealing with Bio::Tree::TreeFunctionsI::reroot() (http://bugzilla.open-bio.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2456
>> ). Any takers?
> I take this one, if I have those privileges ( it is a privilege to
> serve, isn't it?)...
Cool, thanks Mark!
More information about the Bioperl-l