cjfields at illinois.edu
Wed Jan 28 11:28:50 EST 2009
I know many have moved to Taverna, yes. There were some notes on the
wiki about possibly getting bioperl-pipeline working with Taverna but
(as you have noted) no one has progressed along those lines.
On Jan 28, 2009, at 4:39 AM, Giovanni Marco Dall'Olio wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Heikki Lehvaslaiho
> <heikki.lehvaslaiho at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could someone give an update on the current status of
>> bioperl-pipeline/biopipe project?
> There are many other tools you can use to create pipelines.
> For example, make and any derived tool
> - http://swc.scipy.org/lec/build.html
> - http://www.nodalpoint.org/2007/03/18/a_pipeline_is_a_makefile
> or, I have been told well of kepler:
> - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler_scientific_workflow_system
> Hope it can help you.
>> It seems to have been quiet for a long time. Incidentally, same seems
>> to apply on BioMoby project.
>> It is sort of shame, because a lot of good can be said of the aims of
>> both projects.
>> Is there something generic that I just have not heard off or is it
>> Taverna/Grid that has taken over.
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> My blog on bioinformatics (now in English): http://bioinfoblog.it
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
More information about the Bioperl-l