[Bioperl-l] [moby] Re: bioperl-pipeline?

Mark Wilkinson markw at illuminae.com
Wed Jan 28 16:42:12 EST 2009


Biomoby is.... errr.... happy :-)

?  status in what respect ?

M




On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:23:00 -0800, Chris Fields <cjfields at illinois.edu>  
wrote:

> Mark,
>
> I think the general idea was to know what the status of biomoby and  
> bioperl-pipeline was (not the two together).
>
> chris
>
> On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> Hmmm... I can't tell what you want me to do here...  Are there biomoby  
>> components in bioperl-pipeline?  If so,can you tell me which services  
>> you need me to look at?
>>
>> M
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:33:11 -0800, Chris Fields <cjfields at illinois.edu 
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>>>
>>>> biopipe.org is dead. I don't know whether that extends then to  
>>>> bioperl-pipeline, but quite possibly so.
>>>
>>> My guess is yes, it is dead.
>>>
>>>> Biomoby is alive (if possibly in hibernation) AFAIAA. Maybe if we all  
>>>> collectively yell "Mark" he'll wake up and say something.
>>>>
>>>> 	-hilmar
>>>
>>> MAARRRRRKKK!
>>>
>>> chris
>>
>>
>




More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list