[Bioperl-l] [moby] Re: bioperl-pipeline?

Chris Fields cjfields at illinois.edu
Wed Jan 28 16:42:09 EST 2009


I see there is a Moby code release from Feb. 2008, so I'm assuming  
it's very much 'alive' and happy (and still active).

http://biomoby.org/PerlReleases/

chris

On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:

> Biomoby is.... errr.... happy :-)
>
> ?  status in what respect ?
>
> M
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:23:00 -0800, Chris Fields <cjfields at illinois.edu 
> > wrote:
>
>> Mark,
>>
>> I think the general idea was to know what the status of biomoby and  
>> bioperl-pipeline was (not the two together).
>>
>> chris
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm... I can't tell what you want me to do here...  Are there  
>>> biomoby components in bioperl-pipeline?  If so,can you tell me  
>>> which services you need me to look at?
>>>
>>> M
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:33:11 -0800, Chris Fields <cjfields at illinois.edu 
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> biopipe.org is dead. I don't know whether that extends then to  
>>>>> bioperl-pipeline, but quite possibly so.
>>>>
>>>> My guess is yes, it is dead.
>>>>
>>>>> Biomoby is alive (if possibly in hibernation) AFAIAA. Maybe if  
>>>>> we all collectively yell "Mark" he'll wake up and say something.
>>>>>
>>>>> 	-hilmar
>>>>
>>>> MAARRRRRKKK!
>>>>
>>>> chris
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>



More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list