[Bioperl-l] [moby] Re: bioperl-pipeline?

Steffen Moeller steffen_moeller at gmx.de
Thu Jan 29 09:22:25 EST 2009


This is an interesting point you are raising. Are there any advancements (or even
tutorials) on integrating BioPerl functionalities with Taverna? Google only found a rather
oldish thread for me that was very language-agnostic.

Many greetings

Steffen

shawn hoon wrote:
> Hi, yes bioperl-pipeline is very much dead as far as I am concerned. I am
> not sure if there are users out there still. Taverna looks like the way to
> go.
> shawn
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Heikki Lehvaslaiho <
> heikki.lehvaslaiho at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Sorry to give you a jolt.
>>
>> Maybe the website should reflect the activity. The last archive is
>> from June 2008 and when that is the only date on the home page it is a
>> bit worrying.
>>
>> The Moby release link goes through several steps to the CPAN page with
>> a module version 1.04 and download version 1.06 (confusing?) and a
>> copyrigh notice from 2007.
>>
>> Not finding any (apparent) recent activity, I got worried.
>>
>>
>>   -Heikki
>>
>>
>> 2009/1/29 Mark Wilkinson <markw at illuminae.com>:
>>> There are even more recent releases if you download directly from CPAN,
>> and
>>> there are a half-dozen or more CVS commits today alone...
>>>
>>> It's very much an active project!!
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:42:09 -0800, Chris Fields <cjfields at illinois.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I see there is a Moby code release from Feb. 2008, so I'm assuming it's
>>>> very much 'alive' and happy (and still active).
>>>>
>>>> http://biomoby.org/PerlReleases/
>>>>
>>>> chris
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Biomoby is.... errr.... happy :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> ?  status in what respect ?
>>>>>
>>>>> M
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:23:00 -0800, Chris Fields <
>> cjfields at illinois.edu>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mark,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the general idea was to know what the status of biomoby and
>>>>>> bioperl-pipeline was (not the two together).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> chris
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmmm... I can't tell what you want me to do here...  Are there
>> biomoby
>>>>>>> components in bioperl-pipeline?  If so,can you tell me which services
>> you
>>>>>>> need me to look at?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> M
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:33:11 -0800, Chris Fields
>>>>>>> <cjfields at illinois.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> biopipe.org is dead. I don't know whether that extends then to
>>>>>>>>> bioperl-pipeline, but quite possibly so.
>>>>>>>> My guess is yes, it is dead.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Biomoby is alive (if possibly in hibernation) AFAIAA. Maybe if we
>> all
>>>>>>>>> collectively yell "Mark" he'll wake up and say something.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>        -hilmar
>>>>>>>> MAARRRRRKKK!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> chris
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>   -Heikki
>> Heikki Lehvaslaiho - heikki lehvaslaiho gmail com
>> http://kapkaupunki.blogspot.com/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l



More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list