[Bioperl-l] use of no_* to mean 'number_of', negative booleans
hlapp at gmx.net
Tue Jun 9 13:18:05 EDT 2009
Great suggestions, I'm all for it.
On Jun 9, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Chris Fields wrote:
> I've noticed a few methods in bioperl with names like 'no_Foo' that
> mean 'number of Foo' (such as SimpleAlign's no_sequences). The
> problem I foresee are possible ambiguities, particularly with
> negative boolean checks (eg 'no_Foo' could also mean 'this instance
> contains no Foo'), something that BioPerl also has with various
> I suggest we alias these as num_* to disambiguate that. There's no
> easy way to change already in-place flag setting w/o going through a
> deprecation cycle, but we can promote using positive booleans where
> possible (eg 'is_foo' or 'has_foo' instead of 'no_foo'). We can
> leave the older 'no_*' methods as is for the time being and maybe
> deprecate them later.
> If no one has objections I'll add these in as needed.
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at gmx dot net :
More information about the Bioperl-l