[Bioperl-l] bioperl-dev or branch?
hlapp at gmx.net
Mon May 25 16:36:09 EDT 2009
I'm not sure the discussion ever ended in a real decision re: Chase
Miller's Summer of Code project.
My understanding of the consensus is that it being new and
experimental code it should first come to life on bioperl-dev, main
trunk. Existing modules that need to be altered should either be
altered on bioperl-live main trunk or, if the modifications are
expected to be too disruptive, on a branch of bioperl-live that is
expressly created for this purpose (i.e., will be folded back into
main trunk before the conclusion of the summer).
Does that match what everyone else thought?
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at gmx dot net :
More information about the Bioperl-l