[Bioperl-l] bioperl-dev or branch?

Mark A. Jensen maj at fortinbras.us
Mon May 25 17:44:22 EDT 2009


Yes
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hilmar Lapp" <hlapp at gmx.net>
To: "Chris Fields" <cjfields at illinois.edu>; "BioPerl List" 
<bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org>; "Mark A. Jensen" <maj at fortinbras.us>
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] bioperl-dev or branch?


> I'm not sure the discussion ever ended in a real decision re: Chase  Miller's 
> Summer of Code project.
>
> My understanding of the consensus is that it being new and  experimental code 
> it should first come to life on bioperl-dev, main  trunk. Existing modules 
> that need to be altered should either be  altered on bioperl-live main trunk 
> or, if the modifications are  expected to be too disruptive, on a branch of 
> bioperl-live that is  expressly created for this purpose (i.e., will be folded 
> back into  main trunk before the conclusion of the summer).
>
> Does that match what everyone else thought?
>
> -hilmar
> -- 
> ===========================================================
> : Hilmar Lapp  -:-  Durham, NC  -:-  hlapp at gmx dot net :
> ===========================================================
>
>
>
>
> 



More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list