[Bioperl-l] bioperl-dev or branch?
Mark A. Jensen
maj at fortinbras.us
Mon May 25 17:44:22 EDT 2009
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hilmar Lapp" <hlapp at gmx.net>
To: "Chris Fields" <cjfields at illinois.edu>; "BioPerl List"
<bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org>; "Mark A. Jensen" <maj at fortinbras.us>
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] bioperl-dev or branch?
> I'm not sure the discussion ever ended in a real decision re: Chase Miller's
> Summer of Code project.
> My understanding of the consensus is that it being new and experimental code
> it should first come to life on bioperl-dev, main trunk. Existing modules
> that need to be altered should either be altered on bioperl-live main trunk
> or, if the modifications are expected to be too disruptive, on a branch of
> bioperl-live that is expressly created for this purpose (i.e., will be folded
> back into main trunk before the conclusion of the summer).
> Does that match what everyone else thought?
> : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at gmx dot net :
More information about the Bioperl-l