[Bioperl-l] bioperl-dev or branch?
cjfields at illinois.edu
Mon May 25 17:50:08 EDT 2009
On May 25, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> I'm not sure the discussion ever ended in a real decision re: Chase
> Miller's Summer of Code project.
> My understanding of the consensus is that it being new and
> experimental code it should first come to life on bioperl-dev, main
Yes. From there we can determine where it will eventually go (core or
> Existing modules that need to be altered should either be altered on
> bioperl-live main trunk or, if the modifications are expected to be
> too disruptive, on a branch of bioperl-live that is expressly
> created for this purpose (i.e., will be folded back into main trunk
> before the conclusion of the summer).
Yes. When it comes to branching the changes proposed should be
discussed on-list, but that's fairly SOP anyway.
> Does that match what everyone else thought?
Not sure, but I assume non-response is 'yes' unless indicated otherwise.
More information about the Bioperl-l