[Bioperl-l] Moose and Roles

Chris Fields cjfields at illinois.edu
Wed May 27 16:45:58 EDT 2009


(Not intending to respond to myself, but...)

Just so we don't have conflicting namespaces with bioperl/biomoose  
modules, I'll likely install all Moose-based modules in a BioMoose  
namespace for the time being (as opposed to Bio).  This will allow the  
two to run side-by-side for easier benchmarking down the road and  
possible installation for testing.

chris

On May 27, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Chris Fields wrote:

> On May 26, 2009, at 7:17 PM, Mark A. Jensen wrote:
>
>>> ...
>>
>> [Can you tell what I've been reading lately?]
>> I would say any convention that leads naturally to
>> perl6 is a good idea-- maybe even to the point
>> of thinking 'how would this go in perl6' and then
>> naming the Moose-y object accordingly-
>
> Well, we're constrained to a certain extent with Moose methods, but  
> it's a start.  What I can't wait for is grammars in p6; that'll be a  
> very powerful draw towards the language.
>
> chris
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l



More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list