[Bioperl-l] bioperl-db and postgres8.3 - status query
hlapp at drycafe.net
Thu Aug 19 10:58:46 EDT 2010
Yes, unfortunately they do. The feature for obviating them (namely
nested transactions) is there in Pg 8.2+, but Bioperl-db doesn't use
them yet ... I have to learn more about Class::DBIx first to decide
whether it's better to first implement nested transactions in the home-
grown ORM that Bioperl-db in essence is, or whether it's better to
reimplement everything in Class::DBIx instead.
There are new datatypes in Bioperl, and relations in BioSQL that could
hold them, and so I need to decide what's the way forward.
On Aug 19, 2010, at 6:01 AM, Peter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Hilmar Lapp <hlapp at drycafe.net>
>> Hi Dan,
>> the casting isn't an issue anymore, I think. (And even if it were,
>> there is
>> actually a small script that brings back the casts that were built
>> 8.2.) Have you found an example where it still is?
> Hi Hilmar,
> Do the bioperl-db bindings for BioSQL on PostgreSQL still require
> extra rules in the schema?
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at drycafe dot net :
More information about the Bioperl-l