[Bioperl-l] version() vs seq_version()
hlapp at drycafe.net
Sat Jun 26 20:36:17 EDT 2010
Versioning of a sequence database entry and of the sequence itself
need not be the same thing.
Though I guess one can argue that in practice incrementing the version
of a sequence would invariably also increment the version of the
database entry. However, I'm not sure the reverse can necessarily be
taken for granted.
On Jun 25, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Chris Fields wrote:
> Looking at bug 3095:
> As indicated there seems to be some redundancy between
> Bio::Seq::version() and Bio::Seq::RichSeq::seq_version(). Several
> formats (asciitree, genbank, embl, bsml, etc) all call
> seq_version(), whereas others use version() if at all. My guess is
> the SV line from EMBL, but shouldn't using version() handle this?
> Just as an experiment, I actually got seq_version to delegate to
> version() and all tests passed, so maybe this should just delegate
> or alias?
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at drycafe dot net :
More information about the Bioperl-l