[Bioperl-l] Fwd: [Utilities-announce] NCBI Revised E-utility Usage Policy
biopython at maubp.freeserve.co.uk
Wed Mar 24 10:51:46 EDT 2010
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Chris Fields <cjfields at illinois.edu> wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Peter wrote:
>> This is probably of interest to all the Bio* projects offering access
>> to the NCBI Entrez utilities. See forwarded message below.
>> I *think* the new guidelines basically say that the email & tool parameters are
>> optional BUT if your IP address ever gets banned for excessive use you then
>> have to register an email & tool combination.
>> Regarding the email address, the NCBI say to use the email of the developer
>> (not the end user). However, they do not distinguish between the developers
>> of a library (like us), and the developers of an application or script using a
>> library (who may also be the end user).
>> Currently we (Biopython) and I think BioPerl ask developers using our libraries
>> to populate the email address themselves. I *think* this is still the
>> right action.
> Basically, that's the same tactic I'm going with with Bio::DB::EUtilities (and I
> think with the SOAP-based ones as well). We're providing a specific set of
> tools for user to write up their own applications end applications. I can try
> contacting them regarding this to get an official response to clarify this
Please give the NCBI an email - you can CC me too if you like.
> Re: the tool parameter, we currently set the tool itself to 'BioPerl' as a
> default, but always leave the email blank and issue a warning if it isn't
> set. We could just as easily leave both blank and issue warnings for both.
We currently leave out the email and set the tool parameter to "Biopython"
by default but this can be overridden. Currently leaving out the email does
cause Biopython to give a warning.
More information about the Bioperl-l