[Bioperl-l] fastq splitter

Peter Cock p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com
Wed Feb 29 05:32:20 EST 2012

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:42 AM, Fields, Christopher J
<cjfields at illinois.edu> wrote:
> Frankly, there never seemed to be a real fixed standard in the way that FASTQ
> headers were written (and just when it seems there is some consensus, Illumina
> pulls the rug out from under you), hence the reason I leave it alone.  We could
> add some ID munging in there if needed, would just need a qr// with a standard
> fallback.
> chris

Indeed - just like FASTA, it seems every company/tool/database has its own
conventions about the FASTQ ID line and how to stuff as much meta-data
into it as possible. This is a major reason why I hope unaligned reads in
SAM/BAM takes off - places like the Sanger and Broad use this in their



More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list