[Bioperl-l] Bio::Seq issue

Leon Timmermans l.m.timmermans at students.uu.nl
Thu Jun 7 06:04:17 EDT 2012

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Paolo Pavan <paolo.pavan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Do someone agree that they should have the same behaviour?
> It the case, attached patch file applied to Bio/Seq.pm file should do the
> job.

I agree, but your patch is flawed. Peeking and poking into the
internals of another object is a bad idea from a maintenance point of
view, it should probably look like

 sub is_circular { shift->primary_seq->is_circular(@_) }


More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list